Skip to main content

Reading CS Lewis: Mere Christianity

The first CS Lewis book I ever read wasn’t “The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe” but “Mere Christianity”. You may ask why “Mere” was the first Lewis book I read. This has something to do with my spiritual development. Like Lewis, there was a time in my life that I became agnostic.  While a majority of my family was Catholic, we were a multi-faith family and a diversity of  religious views and practices are tolerated.  I have an uncle who became an Orthodox Bishop, several Seventh Day Adventists relatives, Born Agains, Iglesia ni Cristo relations, Episcopalians and Independientes, Muslims and a Buddhist all in one family. A personal religious position such was always respected. The unspoken agreement was that there should be no proselytizing in the family, especially on the dinner table. In our society that has long become religious plural, what does Lewis’ experience tells us about conversion?

Just Merely. “Mere Christianity” should be read with “Surprised by Joy”. Lewis plainly and merely accepted the existence and reality of God in his Magdalen College room. In a trip to Whipsnade Zoo on brother Warnie’s motorbike, by reaching the zoo, Lewis accepted Jesus was Jesus. A few years later he accepted what Christians believed for ages, that Jesus Christ was God. For Lewis, the conversion experience was so ordinary and so embedded in daily life.

It was so ordinary that one reason why “Mere Christianity” became a best seller is that it did away with the polemics of earlier books and the stuffiness and dryness of theological works. While Mere started its discourse on human nature Lewis’ exposition does away with trappings of the ages and reduces Christian belief in its “Mere” sense. The central themes in Christian belief, the Divinity of Jesus Christ, his sacrifice and the mystery of the Holy Trinity are explained in terms of ordinary analogies that appeal to every man and woman. Of course these analogies will never capture the essence of these truths for nothing put into paper ever will. Lewis also believed that spiritual sins are worse than sexual sins. Lewis was very ecumenical and respected Catholic belief and practices and wished not to contribute to the divisions in the Christian Church. In the end we have to make our own conclusions. It’s either Jesus Christ is our redeemer or he is just history’s greatest moral teacher. Lewis clearly argues that to accept the latter is absurd.

And that is the point of conversion. What we stood for in the past is clearly absurd and there is no other way now.

The coming release of movies based on the “Narnia” Chronicles has generated a lot of interest in his books. I hope this interest will be transferred to Lewis’ theological works that aren’t really a hard read.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..." Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government" Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's  El Filibusterismo . Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will in...

Leonard Co (1953-2010), Filipino botanist

With much sadness and shock I learned from WWF chair Lory Tan that internationally renowned botanist Leonard Co was killed together with a guide and a forest ranger last Monday, 15 November in a firefight in Leyte between Armed Forces of the Philippines soldiers and Communist guerrillas. As the Philippine Daily Inquirer reports it ,  Co and his researchers were surveying a forest plot of the Energy Development Corporation (EDC) for native Philippine trees and plants especially those that are in danger of extinction, like this Rafflesia flower (the picture I got from Dr Julie Barcelona's blog . Thank you Julie) The 41 year old Communist insurgency has again claimed another life of the best and brightest of the Philippines. In Leonard Co's case, a bright life that cannot be replaced. For he was one of if not the last of  the classically trained botanists in plant taxonomy and systematics in the Philippines. While one can learn the basics of these disciplines i...

How should we remember General Antonio Luna?

Well it seems with that proposal to rename Camp Aguinaldo to Camp Antonio Luna in time for National Heroes Day has generated a lot of social media buzz. We really have to really understand our national heroes. Antonio Luna was a remarkable personality but like all of us was flawed. He likely would be an academic had the revolution not intervened. He would have been the first Dean of a College of Science of the Philippine University had the nation made the transition to indepe ndence in a peaceful manner. That was recognized by the American College of Pharmacy when they feted Dr Luna on what would have been his 60th birthday noting his work in combating malaria. But that was not to be. He became a soldier. General Luna was for a professional military within the bounds of the constitution. Perhaps that is the biggest sign of contradiction for today. Please answer the question: Would President Duterte (or a President Aquino, Marcos, Arroyo, Quezon etc) have a General Luna as his c...