Skip to main content

Christmas bribes?, presents? and corruption

Three days ago, I had an animated conversation with a former student of mine who now is an mid-level executive of a government agency involved in regulation. He told me that he gets a heaps of Christmas baskets and other presents from contractors and suppliers. His rule is that if the supplier or contactor is involved with a project under his watch, he returns the present. But he finds it increasingly difficult to draw the line.

He says that if it is a money envelope, it is easier to deal with it. He told me that bribers know when to sense if the public servant is really in need of money. So I told him "I am in government service too, and we all know that government servants are ALWAYS IN NEED of money. Just look at the paychecks we get!"

But contrary to what many in the public think, the overwhelming majority of public servants are honest. The papers report of cab drivers, security guards and other blue collar workers returning thousands if not milions of pesos to their rightful owners, without thought of reward. We barely hear of the papers reporting of the honest deeds of public servants. Public servants are very aware of the importance of their job and its ethical dimension. But the public may have the perception that public servants are corrupt.

Civil service directives may order that government employees not to accept presents. But that is futile, Pinoy culture loves presents. And I think that one may receive presents in appreciation for a job well done but we have to leave it at that. The giver must not expect any favours in return as the taker never expected a Christmas present in the first place.

I apply that principle with students who appreciate what I did to them in the semester. I tell them a simple note of appreciation will do, but still some give presents. I give most if not all the presents to people who need them since many of the presents I don't have use for. For example: What am I to do with five Queso de Bolas?

In Robert Bolt's play and movie "Man for all Seasons", Thomas More received a silver cup from a woman who had a case in More's court of requests. More received the gift and whilst on a boat back to Chelsea, threw the cup overboard. The boatman just in time caught it and said "This cup's worth good money!"

Obviously the cup was a bribe. More gave the cup to a social climbing student (who later would give a perjurious testimony in More's own trial for treason). In More's inquest a few years later, the cup would be brought against him. Norfolk would say "As soon as Thomas knew the gift was a bribe, he threw it to the nearest gutter!"

This leads us to the question, when to know if a gift is a bribe or not? And when we realise it is, what then?

Perhaps we could return the present to the briber. In most cases it may be too late. In More's case it was. But can we take comfort that there is a way out.

The Catholic Church teaches that bribery is a violation of the 7th Commandment. In fact bribery is a result and will result to stealing from the poor. So if follows that the bribe may be given to the poor "who are in the gutter". That is the only choice (CCC 2412).

But we have to realise that it is us who have put the poor in the gutter. So the act of gift giving is really a penance. To give presents is to diminish the giver so that the taker will increase. This is a prime Gospel value.

The was the spirit behind the first Christmas presents to the Baby. The Wise Men gave the Lord gold, frankincense and myrrh. The Wise Men recognised the Divinity of the Child and also the inevitable sacrifice He would give so that we may increase.

So if I have turned your concept of what Christmas really is, I apologise. Christmas really is redemptive since it looks into the Passion and the Resurrection. The gifts we give and receive are signs of that truth.

A Blessed Christmas to you!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..." Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government" Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's  El Filibusterismo . Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will in...

Kung bakit dapat maging wikang pambansa din ang Ingles

Isang kakatwang eksena ang nasaksihan ko sa isang pribabdong opisina kamakailan lang. Dalawang empleyado ang inatasang bigyan ng solusyon ang isang isyu tungkol sa logistics. Ang isa ang tubong Davao at ang isa ay taga Iloilo. Ang unang wika nila ay Cebuano (Bisaya) at Hiligaynon (Ilonggo). Ang dalawang wika ay halos pareho ngunit may mga katagang iba ang kahulugan sa isa't isang wika. Ginamit nila ang wika nilang kinalakihan at hindi sila nagkaintindihan. Ang nangyari tuloy ay gumamit na lang sila ng wikang Ingles! Yung na nga rin ang sabi ko. Mag-English na lang kaya kayo! At bakit di wikang Filipino ang ginamit nila? Sa totoo lang, marami pa rin ang hindi bihasa sa Filipino upang gamitin ito sa mga larangan tulad ng logistics. At hindi lamang sa mga larangang teknikal, sa mga biyahe ko sa ibat-ibat lugar sa Pilipinas, ang mga naka-paskel sa mga CR o palikuran tungkol sa pagtitipid ng tubig ay naka sulat sa 1)Wika ng rehiyon 2) Wikang Ingles 3) at minsa'y sa wikang Filipino S...

Leonard Co (1953-2010), Filipino botanist

With much sadness and shock I learned from WWF chair Lory Tan that internationally renowned botanist Leonard Co was killed together with a guide and a forest ranger last Monday, 15 November in a firefight in Leyte between Armed Forces of the Philippines soldiers and Communist guerrillas. As the Philippine Daily Inquirer reports it ,  Co and his researchers were surveying a forest plot of the Energy Development Corporation (EDC) for native Philippine trees and plants especially those that are in danger of extinction, like this Rafflesia flower (the picture I got from Dr Julie Barcelona's blog . Thank you Julie) The 41 year old Communist insurgency has again claimed another life of the best and brightest of the Philippines. In Leonard Co's case, a bright life that cannot be replaced. For he was one of if not the last of  the classically trained botanists in plant taxonomy and systematics in the Philippines. While one can learn the basics of these disciplines i...