Skip to main content

To cheat and then to appeal

I'm not a health professional but I have been closely following the tale of the thousands of board passers of the June 2006 Philippine nursing licensure exams. Since the results came out alleged leakages of test questions were made by some nursing professionals. It seems that there is enough evidence of cheating to warrant the filing of charges against certain individuals. The Professional Regulatory Commission delayed the nurses' oath taking but eventually given them licenses.

Since many of the nurses would want to work in the USA, they would have to pass through American professional regulation requirements as well as immigration requirements. The US Federal Government contracts the CGFNS to screen applicants before immigration goes over their applications. This is the VisaScreen certificate that organization gives to qualified nurses. Because of the cheating allegations CGFNS believes it cannot give VisaScreens to Filipino nurses who passed the June exams.

The CGFNS believes that the June 2006 exams are compromised and because of this does not meet US licensure requirements. The CGFNS did not cast judgement on the Philippine regulatory system but on the equivalence June 2006 credentials to US credentials. The US organization requested applicants to retake the compromised tests. So the Philippine government made an appeal for CGFNS to reconsider. It did not. And once more a delegation headed by a Philippine member of Congress flew to Philadelphia to appeal once more.

This is where it becomes really pathetic. Teachers and students know that exams are just one of the tools to measure competence. But exams are not just a measure, they are important measures. We know that failure on an exam does not mean the examinee is incompetent. There are a zillion reasons why students fail exams. There are avenues to make it up. First one can retake the exam. And if one had good reasons that he/she failed the exam due to bias due to bias among the examiners, one can request for a remark of the exam or to launch an appeal.

Appeals are decided on the concept of natural justice. Cheating during exams is never a ground for an appeal especially for a foreign organization that has nothing to do how our professions are regulated. Most universities and schools have drastic penalties for cheating. Under the natural justice concept, the PRC should have severely dealt with the perpetrators of the cheating under the law. The politicking administration of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has a large part for the blame since it was so indecisive when it should have had the cheaters arrested and charged for a criminal offence.

Now that CGFNS would not give in. The Arroyo administration has made all arrangements for a retake and then gave a gag order until the congressional delegation arrives from the US.

Cultural dissonance? Probably, the Pinoy values of finding "lahat ng paraan" (finding all avenues for remedy) which is not in itself bad, "palusot" (alibi) which is bad since alibis never solve a problem and "awa" (pity) which is both good and bad depending in the circumstances.

I see that seeking "awa" from CGFNS is pathetic. After all they have nothing to do with the cheating scandal. The Arroyo adminstration, the PRC and that congressional delegation should seek pity from the parents who financed the education of these new nurses.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How should we remember General Antonio Luna?

Well it seems with that proposal to rename Camp Aguinaldo to Camp Antonio Luna in time for National Heroes Day has generated a lot of social media buzz. We really have to really understand our national heroes. Antonio Luna was a remarkable personality but like all of us was flawed. He likely would be an academic had the revolution not intervened. He would have been the first Dean of a College of Science of the Philippine University had the nation made the transition to indepe ndence in a peaceful manner. That was recognized by the American College of Pharmacy when they feted Dr Luna on what would have been his 60th birthday noting his work in combating malaria. But that was not to be. He became a soldier. General Luna was for a professional military within the bounds of the constitution. Perhaps that is the biggest sign of contradiction for today. Please answer the question: Would President Duterte (or a President Aquino, Marcos, Arroyo, Quezon etc) have a General Luna as his c...

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..." Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government" Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's  El Filibusterismo . Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will in...

Marikina River and the "janitor" fish

My newest environmental science research project is to determine the evolutionary biology of invasion by the "janitor fish" in Marikina River. Today we made our first survey and collections. Marikina River is the"greenest"in Metro Manila but that is just on the surface. One master's student is doing her thesis on biotic integrity and a volunteer MD is working on the project too. The "janitor fish (Pterygoplichthys sp) is the dominant fish now in the river,displacing traditional Marikina food fishes such as dalag and hito. The fish are collected and left to rot on the riverbanks. Despite this, there is still some subsistence fishing on the river. The highest densities of the fish are observed near sewage outfalls where they find food to eat. It is likely that the fish can be controlled if we can clean up the river! BTW the name "janitor fish" insults janitors. The fish thrive in dirty rivers and don't clean them up. Janitors on the other hand, ...