Skip to main content


Non- overlapping magisteria (NOMA) is a term that Stephen Jay Gould proposed to define what the relation of science and religion should be. In his book “Rock of Ages” Gould defends the idea that science and religion are pre-eminent in their own spheres of inquiry. The Church (read Catholic) has supreme authority to teach faith, while Science (read Natural) has supreme authority to teach about how the natural world works. While Gould does a masterful exposition of the idea together with some theologizing (for which he was criticized since he was overstepping NOMA!), he is a bit late. The Catholic Church even before John Paul II was elected; was burned in the Galileo affair and had long accepted that idea. Catholic theologians did not term it as NOMA but as principle of limitation (PP). Philosophers have also called it the Independence Principle.

It was Galileo that put this line of argument on paper. In his theological treatise “Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina” Galileo argued that natural science can serve as an appropriate aid to the correct interpretation of scripture. However, this does not imply that the reverse is true that is scripture cannot be an appropriate aide to the correct interpretation of science. Another consequence of this is that all natural phenomena as stated in scripture have no salvation value. Science and religion are not in conflict. I cannot elaborate on the theological consequences here but the idea puts science and religion in “comfy” quarters. (But of course, some theologians challenge this principle)

The Church has accepted this NOMA principle beginning with Leo XIII in 1893 and most clearly stated by John Paul II in 1980 and 1996. John Paul II calls for dialogue between science and religion. This is a position still taken by his successor Benedict XVI. The question is where does one draw the line? The Church with reference to biological evolution drew the line about the possible evolution of the “soul”. For which Gould, says there wasn’t a problem since science can’t even define what a soul is. John Paul II accepted the idea that evolution was “more than a hypothesis” and stopped there. For the Pope, a matter regarding science is best left to the scientists to resolve.

And so we have it, science and religion in comfy coexistence. It seems that the possibility of another Galileo affair was averted. But is it really so? Is science and religion really in comfy coexistence? Or do we have to worry about a mini-Galileo affair in the Philippines?

It seems that there might be a problem. For instance the President has appointed bishops to chair commissions to look into some environmental problems. One Catholic bishop declined stating Canon Law respects the separation between church and state. However the President appointed another bishop who consented. In a press conference, the good bishop used philosophy, history and a bit of theologizing to make a recommendation while ignoring environmental science studies on the problem. The environmental science studies support a contrary position than that taken by the bishop.

One op-ed columnist put the whole affair as a “Church-State” separation problem. I believe that he missed the point. It is not a Church-State separation problem but a NOMA problem.

Clerics if appropriately qualified as scientists may give informed statements on scientific problems (After all there are Catholic priests with science PhDs and many of them are Jesuits). But if a cleric is not a scientist, I think he must decline from making recommendations on a matter that is best left to scientists to determine.

In the Philippines society has not come to a stage of development where scientists are recognized for their important role. Thus it does not surprise us that the Presidential palace would seek the advice of clerics on matters that science can deal with. What’s the solution? It would be best to teach science well.

The op-ed columnist suggests that bishops should “pray for more discernment”. The President should probably read Gould.

PS: The Vatican’s chief astronomer Father George Coyne SJ was replaced. News has it that the priest gave statements supporting evolutionary theory in response to a Cardinal who questioned the validity of Darwin’s theory. This Cardinal is a close confidant of the present Pope. The Vatican denies the rumours.


Popular posts from this blog

President Manuel Luis Quezon's Code of Ethics

Being a denizen of Kyusi, in honour of the man who gave my city its name and for being the most colourful prez the Philippines ever had, I have the pleasure to post Manuel L Quezon's Code of Ethics on his birthday. Let us profit from the wisdom of the Kastila.

1. Have Faith in the Divine Providence that guides the destinies of men and nations.

2. Love your country for it is the home of your people, the seat of your affection and the source of your happiness and well-being. It's defense is your primary duty. Be ready to sacrifice and die for it if necessary.

3. Respect the Constitution which is the expression of your sovereign will. The government is your government. It has been established for your safety and welfare. Obey the laws and see that they are observed by all and that public officials comply with their duties.

4. Pay your taxes willingly and promptly. Citizenship implies not only rights but obligations.

5. Safeguard the purity of suffrage and abide by the decisions of the…

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..."
Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government"
Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's El Filibusterismo. Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will instigate it.

Kartilla of the Katipunan

In celebration of Andres Bonifacio Day on Nov 30, I am blogging my English translation of the Katipunan's Code of Ethics or Kartilla (Kartilya). Recruits to the revolutionary association had to learn these by heart. The code was first written by Emilio Jacinto. The Kartilya remains as relevant today as in 1896 .

My apologies for errors in translation. I know there are better translations than this one.

1) A life not spent for a holy and noble cause is like a tree without shade or a noxious weed.

2) Acts that stem from pride and selfishness do not come from a desire to help others..

3) True holiness comes from helping others, charity towards others and the measure of such is in each reasonable act or word.

4) Dark or white your skin may be, all men are equal though one may be greater in knowledge, material wealth, beauty these do not add to one’s humanity.

5) Those who are men of goodwill put honour before concern for self and those who do no good puts the self before honour.

6) For an ho…