Skip to main content

Updates on the new UP Charter

The University of the Philippines (UP) has released for downloading copies of House Bill 5008 (that has passed third reading) and Senate Bill 1833 that seek to amend the 98 year old UP Charter Act 1870 passed by the colonial legislature of the time, the Philippine Assembly.

Nationalists rightly point out that the UP Charter has reference to the American Governor General. But this is not that relevant now for our identity as an independent nation with a Filipino National university. I always point out that the Australian Constiutution still refers to Queen Victoria of England. No Aussie in his/her right mind would think that he/she is still a subject of the Queen of England. Thus Queen Victoria in Australia and The American Governor General in the UP are of historic interest only.

What is more essential is that the UP has outgrown the old charter that specifies that the university be located in Manila. UP today is found in other places in the Philippines. So there is a need for a new charter.

The problems that bedevil the university stems from years of misdirected priorities and diminishing state subsidy. Not only is state funding hardly growing, the value of this subsidy has shrunk. Students still sit in crowded classrooms and sometimes sit on no chairs at all during lectures. To be fair, much these problems have been overcome but there is still more to be done. With increasing demand for a UP student placement, we can expect the problem to get worse.

Professors' salaries have hardly been adjusted to meet increasing costs of living. The same is true for the non-academics who run the daily business of the university. The bills address the problem of salaries but in different ways. The house version does not exempt the university from the government Salary Standardisation Law but gives leeway to the university to institute an allowance scheme that could give an additional 100% to a professor's salary. The question is does every prof get this allowance or not?

The house version also provides make-up classes and exams for students who are absent for religious reasons. I believe that this violates the separation between church and state. The UP as a state institution should be neutral to religion favouring none but not restricting on its private practice. As a prof myself, this clause is pernicious since it would be my responsibility to determine what constitutes religious practice or not before I give make-up exams. I believe no professor should be compelled to do this.

The house bill also complicates university administration by creating university and system assemblies that may determine policy. The university is a probably the only one of two medieval ideas ( Church is the other one) where autonomy from political meddling by the State (or anyone for that matter) has been vigorously defended against, even if to displease the Church or the State. Academic freedom is maintained in any university since the governance of which is vested in the professors.

The Senate version mandates civil service eligibility for profs something that the 1908 act exempts (President Roman has said this has been dropped) and creates an oversight committee over the Board of Regents (again a source of possible meddling by politicians).

In a bicameral legislative system both bills will be reconciled in the bicameral committee. This is where the horse-trading happens and the public may be kept in the dark. The students, profs, alumni and staff of the university have to exert extra vigilance and interest.


Popular posts from this blog

President Manuel Luis Quezon's Code of Ethics

Being a denizen of Kyusi, in honour of the man who gave my city its name and for being the most colourful prez the Philippines ever had, I have the pleasure to post Manuel L Quezon's Code of Ethics on his birthday. Let us profit from the wisdom of the Kastila.

1. Have Faith in the Divine Providence that guides the destinies of men and nations.

2. Love your country for it is the home of your people, the seat of your affection and the source of your happiness and well-being. It's defense is your primary duty. Be ready to sacrifice and die for it if necessary.

3. Respect the Constitution which is the expression of your sovereign will. The government is your government. It has been established for your safety and welfare. Obey the laws and see that they are observed by all and that public officials comply with their duties.

4. Pay your taxes willingly and promptly. Citizenship implies not only rights but obligations.

5. Safeguard the purity of suffrage and abide by the decisions of the…

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..."
Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government"
Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's El Filibusterismo. Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will instigate it.

Kartilla of the Katipunan

In celebration of Andres Bonifacio Day on Nov 30, I am blogging my English translation of the Katipunan's Code of Ethics or Kartilla (Kartilya). Recruits to the revolutionary association had to learn these by heart. The code was first written by Emilio Jacinto. The Kartilya remains as relevant today as in 1896 .

My apologies for errors in translation. I know there are better translations than this one.

1) A life not spent for a holy and noble cause is like a tree without shade or a noxious weed.

2) Acts that stem from pride and selfishness do not come from a desire to help others..

3) True holiness comes from helping others, charity towards others and the measure of such is in each reasonable act or word.

4) Dark or white your skin may be, all men are equal though one may be greater in knowledge, material wealth, beauty these do not add to one’s humanity.

5) Those who are men of goodwill put honour before concern for self and those who do no good puts the self before honour.

6) For an ho…