Skip to main content

Independence Day, Citizenship and additional thoughts on English

Like a Pope, Her Excellency Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has made many of our sacred national holidays movable feasts. This reminds me when Paul VI decided to make Epiphany movable (the first Sunday after New Year's Day) right after Vatican II concluded. There was resistance since a lot of people especially children who had learned their third R calculated that they would lose a few days from the 12 days of Christmas. But if January 1 happened to be a Sunday then kids would get 2 extra days of Christmas.

But why bother? Schools tend to restart their terms on the first Monday after January 1. Christmas evaporates soon afterward.

Gloria made June 12 movable, something unthinkable in other countries. What if the United States of America made July 4 movable (following Gloria's lead) and by quirk of calendar fate, Independence day fell on July 1? Horrors for the Americans! That's Canada Day!

England and the other Commonwealth realms celebrate a national day called the Queen's Birthday. Well this is somewhat movable and different realms have different dates for the Queen's Birthday. The Queen has just one natal day. The common thread is that these birthdays falls on the sunniest day of the year. Her Majesty would not object. For her devotion to duty she deserves a sunny birthday.

Nonetheless whether the President makes it movable or not, Independence Day is an important day. I just perused a blurb for expats where in an interview people were asked if independence is a good thing for the nation. The majority said a resounding "yes". Some said that even if we are in a mess, at least we have our rights. One female university student said that if we were under Spain still, then we could still be shot like Rizal for opposing the government. Another said that if we were under the Americans still, we would be second-class citizens.

And this is where I would comment. This is really true and I know it for a fact. If we were still a colony of the US, Spain, Japan, Britain etc, we would always be second class citizens in our own land. Even if we had stratospheric economic growth and GDPs we would be still unfree.

In the US I had the opportunity to chat with Puerto Ricans who as US citizens can live and work on the mainland. Puerto Rico if we will recall is linked with our history as Filipinos. This Caribbean island was part of the 20 million dollar sale of Spanish colonies (that included our country) as a result of Spain losing the Spanish-American War. Puerto Rico is a Commonwealth of the USA and enjoys a lot of powers given to US states. But they are not a state.

One Puerto Rican explained to me that as US citizens they have almost all the benefits and obligations conferred by that status. But unlike other native born Americans, their citizenship can be revoked without their consent by the US Congress. The Congress legislated their US Citizenship, the Congress can take it away! So some Puerto Ricans have tried to define Puerto Rican citizenship which cannot be taken away by Congress. But American courts say this doesn't exist.

Puerto Ricans are second class citizens still. The only way they can secure their national identity is to be independent. This is a major political hot potato of a topic in that territory.

We Filipinos are independent and enjoy our citizenship that cannot be stripped unless we renounce it. Not even the Congress or the Presidential Palace can strip us of our citizenship. And even if our government treats us like second-class citizens, we are never in that status. We have to continue the struggle of the First Philippine Republic, the republic that gave the colonizers a bloody nose!

"Los invasores, No te hallaran jamas!"

"Viva la Republica Filipina!"

Maligayang Araw ng Kalayaan sa lahat!

English Hong Kong China

The latest Time Asia magazine issue on Hong Kong after the British handover has a round table discussion transcript with that SAR's leading citizens that include former Chief Secretary and head of the civil service Anson Chan, civic rights leader Christine Loh, property tycoon Gordon Wu, Barrister Daniel Fung and Beijing journalist Raymond Zhou.

The transcript deal with whether HK-SAR has fared better under Beijing or was better under London. Everyone seems to agree that HK has fared quite well though there can be some improvement towards a more democratic society. But what is relevant for us Filipinos is the SAR's language issue.

Zhou says that before the handover his friends advised him NOT to speak Mandarin (speak English or Cantonese instead). Now he can or has to speak anything, English, Mandarin or Cantonese. He is no longer treated as a mainlander but just like any Chinese citizen. He feels more comfortable with the present situation,

It seems that English proficiency was a casualty of the handover. Everyone agrees that English is needed in maintaining the SAR's competitiveness. Even if Shanghai or Haikou competes for investment with Hong Kong, the SAR would still be more "international" if it could maintain English proficiency among its citizens. Take note none of the leading Hong Kong Chinese citizens implied that becoming English proficient means losing Chinese identity. Hong Kong will still remain Chinese even if a majority of citizens speak English.

Language proficiency is key to Hong Kong's continued economic growth now that 90% of economy is service driven. Anson Chan suggests that the SAR create a sort of an environment where people can speak English. While Hong Kong people have fallen behind with their English, Singaporeans have moved ahead with English since the Singapore government has created an environment where speaking English is favoured.

Fung says that an attitude change is needed that goes beyond language. HK citizens are still resistant in learning or using Mandarin. After the handover there was insistence of teaching in the mother tongue, Cantonese. This has made Hong Kong people less competitive with dealing with the Mainland. The solution according to Fung is an attitude change that simply says that nothing is lost and a lot to gain by learning Mandarin and English.

These are some issues that should illuminate the Philippines' language debate. I think we all need an attitude change.

Maybe Zhou is right. If we are able to speak any language without the historical baggage, we can be more comfortable.


DJB Rizalist said…
I think the historical baggage of which you speak is being lugged around not so much by Filipinos in general but by a tiny but committed anti-American minority. Have you seen the latest SWS survey on global attitudes towards America?

Regarding "colonies" wouldn't you agree that Japan is a perfect semi-colony of the US? It's entire national defense is virtually in American hands, yet Japan is not only economically independent, but the 2nd largest economy in the world. Still.
I am a Chinese study adviser from Beijing. If you have interests in Chinese language, I would like to invite you to participate in an online survey (supported by Google Blogger) about learn Chinese and mandarin on our blog: Thanks.

Popular posts from this blog

President Manuel Luis Quezon's Code of Ethics

Being a denizen of Kyusi, in honour of the man who gave my city its name and for being the most colourful prez the Philippines ever had, I have the pleasure to post Manuel L Quezon's Code of Ethics on his birthday. Let us profit from the wisdom of the Kastila.

1. Have Faith in the Divine Providence that guides the destinies of men and nations.

2. Love your country for it is the home of your people, the seat of your affection and the source of your happiness and well-being. It's defense is your primary duty. Be ready to sacrifice and die for it if necessary.

3. Respect the Constitution which is the expression of your sovereign will. The government is your government. It has been established for your safety and welfare. Obey the laws and see that they are observed by all and that public officials comply with their duties.

4. Pay your taxes willingly and promptly. Citizenship implies not only rights but obligations.

5. Safeguard the purity of suffrage and abide by the decisions of the…

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..."
Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government"
Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's El Filibusterismo. Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will instigate it.

Kartilla of the Katipunan

In celebration of Andres Bonifacio Day on Nov 30, I am blogging my English translation of the Katipunan's Code of Ethics or Kartilla (Kartilya). Recruits to the revolutionary association had to learn these by heart. The code was first written by Emilio Jacinto. The Kartilya remains as relevant today as in 1896 .

My apologies for errors in translation. I know there are better translations than this one.

1) A life not spent for a holy and noble cause is like a tree without shade or a noxious weed.

2) Acts that stem from pride and selfishness do not come from a desire to help others..

3) True holiness comes from helping others, charity towards others and the measure of such is in each reasonable act or word.

4) Dark or white your skin may be, all men are equal though one may be greater in knowledge, material wealth, beauty these do not add to one’s humanity.

5) Those who are men of goodwill put honour before concern for self and those who do no good puts the self before honour.

6) For an ho…