Skip to main content

Erap convicted of plunder: A tragedy

I have been monitoring the developments after President Joseph "Erap" Estrada was convicted of capital offence of plunder. He is the first one ever brought to court and convicted. Erap will have to serve a lifetime sentence (40 years maximum) for the crime, the death penalty being abolished by Congress.

I tried to read the Sandiganbayan court's decision online but as expected the site hosting it exceeded its bandwidth. Nonetheless the case should set a precedent and lawyers, deans of law schools and legal scholars have begun to dissect the ruling. While the lawyers will look at the merits and demerits of the ruling and also looking at the apparent weakness of the defence, the case has reopened the debate on what should have been settled by the courts and that is whether the form of Erap's abandonment of the Palace at the height of the EDSA II ruckus constituted a resignation.

Resignation requires a written notice at best or at least an emphatic "I quit" as all employees know. In fact the declarative "I quit!" is enough to tell your boss you are not under his/her authority anymore.

In the case of Erap's abandonment of his post the Supreme Court relied on circumstantial evidence to define what a "constructive resignation" is. Hilario Davide's Supreme Court went beyond what the English Parliament did in the Glorious Revolution of 1688 when it handed the crown to the Protestant William of Orange.

But in England then as is now Parliament is surpreme and is the elected representative of the Commons. It cannot be bound by the court but is reigned in by convention and public opinion. Constitutional experts say with jest and gravitas that Parliament can hand the succession to a dog! This is to say that Parliament may pass an act to determine the succession something that Henry VIII's Parliament did so many times. When asked about whether to recognise the Princess Elizabeth as heir to the throne, Thomas More was said to reply "The King in Parliament tells me so."

The Supreme Court (a servant of the Constitution) did what the Constitution as our sovereign does and this is to determine the succession. This new state of affairs we have here is that we may have a court that is bound by nothing not even the Law it is sworn to uphold. This is the point of many commentaries on the Erap resignation.

Is the Supreme Court our sovereign? It does not even represent you and me. It is nothing but a servant of the Constitution like Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.

While there is a case to convict Erap of plunder (he was a complete disaster as President), the verdict is played on the larger tragedy of a weakened Constitution thanks to Davide's Supreme Court and the fascistic tryst of Gloriana using dubious means to subvert the constitution.

The impeachment trial should have been brought to its conclusion for the sake of the Constitution.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kung bakit dapat maging wikang pambansa din ang Ingles

Isang kakatwang eksena ang nasaksihan ko sa isang pribabdong opisina kamakailan lang. Dalawang empleyado ang inatasang bigyan ng solusyon ang isang isyu tungkol sa logistics. Ang isa ang tubong Davao at ang isa ay taga Iloilo. Ang unang wika nila ay Cebuano (Bisaya) at Hiligaynon (Ilonggo). Ang dalawang wika ay halos pareho ngunit may mga katagang iba ang kahulugan sa isa't isang wika. Ginamit nila ang wika nilang kinalakihan at hindi sila nagkaintindihan. Ang nangyari tuloy ay gumamit na lang sila ng wikang Ingles! Yung na nga rin ang sabi ko. Mag-English na lang kaya kayo! At bakit di wikang Filipino ang ginamit nila? Sa totoo lang, marami pa rin ang hindi bihasa sa Filipino upang gamitin ito sa mga larangan tulad ng logistics. At hindi lamang sa mga larangang teknikal, sa mga biyahe ko sa ibat-ibat lugar sa Pilipinas, ang mga naka-paskel sa mga CR o palikuran tungkol sa pagtitipid ng tubig ay naka sulat sa 1)Wika ng rehiyon 2) Wikang Ingles 3) at minsa'y sa wikang Filipino S

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..." Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government" Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's  El Filibusterismo . Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will in

President Manuel Luis Quezon's Code of Ethics

Being a denizen of Kyusi, in honour of the man who gave my city its name and for being the most colourful prez the Philippines ever had, I have the pleasure to post Manuel L Quezon's Code of Ethics on his birthday. Let us profit from the wisdom of the Kastila. 1. Have Faith in the Divine Providence that guides the destinies of men and nations. 2. Love your country for it is the home of your people, the seat of your affection and the source of your happiness and well-being. It's defense is your primary duty. Be ready to sacrifice and die for it if necessary. 3. Respect the Constitution which is the expression of your sovereign will. The government is your government. It has been established for your safety and welfare. Obey the laws and see that they are observed by all and that public officials comply with their duties. 4. Pay your taxes willingly and promptly. Citizenship implies not only rights but obligations. 5. Safeguard the purity of suffrage and abide by the decisions of