Skip to main content

The mosque near Ground Zero

President Barack Hussein Obama was reported by the US media to support the establishment of a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero in lower Manhattan, New York City. He cites the religious liberty rights of Americans.

The construction of a mosque near Ground Zero [not ON Ground Zero as thought by some] has generated much heated debate. Some Christians have likened this to a conquering Islamic army establishing Mosques as a sign of victory. Surely such imagery does not help a dispassionate discussion of the matter.

While the 9/11 attacks were instigated by Islamic militants, this should not be made to disparage the rest of the world's Muslims who sincerely follow the call of their faith to peace.

The problem with tacking any denominational religious meaning to the Ground Zero site is that not only Christians were killed there. There were Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, non-believers, believers of smaller faith traditions and Muslims too. No religious tradition can appropriate the site which is holy ground. Pope Benedict XVI did not say the Mass there but lead his flock to say inaudible prayers. No cross or marker was left to mark this historical event [except pictures] since the Vatican has learned from its previous mistakes as discussed in the next paragraph. In fact anyone should be allowed to say their prayers there without imposing any permanent religious symbolism.

This is the same issue in Auschwitz which we recognize as a place where many Jews were murdered by the Nazi (who were for the most German). But it was not only the Jews. Roman Catholics, Romas, gays, Adventists, Protestants, non-conformists, Jehovah's Witnesses were also murdered there. So can the followers of these faiths be prevented from having a space there? The Catholic nuns put up a convent nearby but the Vatican ordered the nuns to transfer elsewhere. Pope John Paul II celebrated a Mass there in 1979 and a cross was erected to mark the event. The Vatican also ordered its removal but due to opposition from Poles, the cross is still there.

The question that is the basis of the debate in Poland is whose holocaust was it? Was it solely for the Jews or the Polish Christians that were murdered in Auschwitz?

The same question can be asked in Lower Manhattan. Whose holocaust was the 9/11 attacks for? Was it for the Americans only [by this we mean that they hold US passports and are part of the mainstream, presumably Christian]? Or is it for all people of many nationalities since we do know that there were foreign workers and tourists at the Twin Towers on that fateful day?

The Carmelite nuns had their convent not within Auschwitz death camp but just outside the walls. This is so similar to the NYC mosque. It is not on Ground Zero but a few blocks away. The resolution of these issues are not that easy. But they would require the consensus of the community, in the NYC case, the New Yorkers and the American people [including immigrants and the undocumented who worked in the Towers too]

But the Islamic prayer space we call a mosque has its own architecture. Is that architecture so abhorrent near Ground Zero? Is it as abhorrent as a Christian church that could be built nearby which has the cross and a typical Waspy or Irish Catholic architecture? Will some Americans go into fits over a church near Ground Zero?

These questions American should answer. What is the nature of their religious liberties? Some Americans compare their opposition to the mosque in the same way some Islamic countries oppose Christian churches on their territory. The problem is that America guarantees religious liberty and those Islamic countries do not. Now it is another issue to convince these emirates to grant religious liberty to residents of their countries. Some of the emirates have realized the wisdom of allowing freedom of worship and returning to an earlier Islamic tradition of respecting the rights of Christians and Jews to worship as they please.

As for me, I would support a Ground Zero sacred space devoid of religious symbolism. This is somewhat similar to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb memorials. The human spirit (as sensed by the heart) in its longing to touch the Divine Peace is enough.

Comments

Jego said…
Im sure President Obama appreciates your sentiments, but unfortunately top Muslims dont agree. They do *not* want a mosque there. In fact they condemn it. (The last link is auto-translated by Google from the original arabic.)
Ben Vallejo said…
Too bad Islam does not have a Pope who can order believers to desist from building a mosque on sites like these.

Popular posts from this blog

Kartilla of the Katipunan

In celebration of Andres Bonifacio Day on Nov 30, I am blogging my English translation of the Katipunan's Code of Ethics or Kartilla (Kartilya). Recruits to the revolutionary association had to learn these by heart. The code was first written by Emilio Jacinto. The Kartilya remains as relevant today as in 1896 .

My apologies for errors in translation. I know there are better translations than this one.

1) A life not spent for a holy and noble cause is like a tree without shade or a noxious weed.

2) Acts that stem from pride and selfishness do not come from a desire to help others..

3) True holiness comes from helping others, charity towards others and the measure of such is in each reasonable act or word.

4) Dark or white your skin may be, all men are equal though one may be greater in knowledge, material wealth, beauty these do not add to one’s humanity.

5) Those who are men of goodwill put honour before concern for self and those who do no good puts the self before honour.

6) For an ho…

President Manuel Luis Quezon's Code of Ethics

Being a denizen of Kyusi, in honour of the man who gave my city its name and for being the most colourful prez the Philippines ever had, I have the pleasure to post Manuel L Quezon's Code of Ethics on his birthday. Let us profit from the wisdom of the Kastila.

1. Have Faith in the Divine Providence that guides the destinies of men and nations.

2. Love your country for it is the home of your people, the seat of your affection and the source of your happiness and well-being. It's defense is your primary duty. Be ready to sacrifice and die for it if necessary.

3. Respect the Constitution which is the expression of your sovereign will. The government is your government. It has been established for your safety and welfare. Obey the laws and see that they are observed by all and that public officials comply with their duties.

4. Pay your taxes willingly and promptly. Citizenship implies not only rights but obligations.

5. Safeguard the purity of suffrage and abide by the decisions of the…

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..."
Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government"
Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's El Filibusterismo. Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will instigate it.