Skip to main content

Finally recognizing the failures of the EDSA constitutional system

For the first time, Congress (Senate and House), Civil Society and the Church have agreed that it is now opportune to amend the 1987 Constitution now. This I call the EDSA Constitutional system for it was born of a revolt on a highway and its creation announced on a military parade ground a stone's throw from that highway.  I was witness to both events.  The main reason why all agree to amend it is that the incumbent Chief Executive is simply not interested in prolonging his stay in the Palace.

But the President is nor thrilled about the whole enterprise which is puzzling since his problems in reforming governance is really stymied by how the Constitution is interpreted and applied. Former Supreme Court Chief Justice Reynato Puno in his address to the University of the Philippines upon his receiving the Dr of Laws degree says that Philippine democracy is in a "stretcher". I don't think it is in a stretcher yet but I think Philippine democracy has an autoimmune disease. One organ system is attacking the other and thus condemning the body to an early death.

Chief Justice Puno lists seven core areas where the nation can reform the 1987 charter's 'dinosaur" provisions. Much of these areas deal with the inherent gridlock of the Presidential system, insulating the judiciary from political influence and giving it budget and fiscal autonomy, and the lack of the republican character of the State. A radical proposal is to make economic and rights to education as civil rights.

There is a implied proposal to revisit the cabinet system of government (more popularly but inaccurately known as "parliamentary system" of government). One of the tragedies of the Cory Aquino ascendancy is that she could have had the Batasan dissolved under her powers, call for reelection and pack the Parliament with her supporters and enact the necessary reforms, the most immediate by which she could have amended using her decree making powers the 1973 Constitution back to its democratic form (which should have been  one of the best ways to spite Ferdinand Marcos) a much later reform was to call for an elected constitutional convention which could have made the cleanest break from the Marcosian past. This would have allowed the nation to heal itself and become less polarized. Mrs Aquino needed not have been a dictator. This was the line by which Prime Minister and Vice President Doy Laurel would have wanted. Laurel should have been left as Prime Minister heading the government and implementing Mrs Aquino's revolution and overseeing the constitutional transition. Puno implies that appointing a non-elected constitutional commission is one of the roots of the problem.

The way the 1987 Constitution was born with the appointment of commissioners rather than elected delegates doomed any moves to amend it. The 1987 Constitution was a fruit from a poisoned tree, even it guaranteed democratic governance. The resulting Presidential system was so dysfunctional and has metamorphosed into a body politic with an autoimmune disorder. The 1987 Constitution has only one goal and that is to prevent another Ferdinand Marcos from occupying the palace. The more diminutive (in physical stature but not in reputation) Mrs Gloria Macapagal Arroyo tried to do a Marcos. She could have succeeded if not for the changed geopolitical environment which now has SMS messaging, the Internet, Twitter, Facebook, blogs etc.

The supreme irony in this whole tale is that while the 1987 Constitution was successfully launched (amid coups and other preventable disasters) by the first President Aquino, the failure of the system is finally represented by the second President Aquino. The failures can be seen in 1) The Marcoses being zoomed back to power, 2) Mutineers like Honasan and Trillanes occupying senate seats and 3) The constitutional blocks to Mr Aquino's plans to reform governance. You call the EDSA constitution a revolution?

In England's Glorious (Constitutional) Revolution when the William and Mary of Orange were offered the Crown, Parliament became sovereign. The Divine Right of Kings was finally consigned to history and a Bill of Rights was promulgated. This is where we draw our civil rights. But the Revolution sealed the Protestant Ascendancy. We should have had something similar (not in disenfranchising Catholics, Protestants or whatever!) by ensuring the past should never be ascendant again!

It is time to consign the EDSA Constitutional system to history. Mr Noynoy Aquino's lackluster administration may yet be saved by ensuring that the 1987 Constitution is amended or better yet replaced by another one. For Cabinet system fans like me, we can revisit the 1973 Constitution by correcting its most obvious defect that even a non-lawyer would see. It puts no Reserve Powers in the Head of State. Even the Queen of England still has her reserve powers which she hardly if ever exercises since Her government is responsible to Parliament and Parliament responsible to the Electorate. The Queen and the Electorate have guaranteed democracy in Great Britain. We can also adopt the more progressive clauses of the 1987 Constitution have these in a new constitution.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kartilla of the Katipunan

In celebration of Andres Bonifacio Day on Nov 30, I am blogging my English translation of the Katipunan's Code of Ethics or Kartilla (Kartilya). Recruits to the revolutionary association had to learn these by heart. The code was first written by Emilio Jacinto. The Kartilya remains as relevant today as in 1896 .

My apologies for errors in translation. I know there are better translations than this one.

1) A life not spent for a holy and noble cause is like a tree without shade or a noxious weed.

2) Acts that stem from pride and selfishness do not come from a desire to help others..

3) True holiness comes from helping others, charity towards others and the measure of such is in each reasonable act or word.

4) Dark or white your skin may be, all men are equal though one may be greater in knowledge, material wealth, beauty these do not add to one’s humanity.

5) Those who are men of goodwill put honour before concern for self and those who do no good puts the self before honour.

6) For an ho…

President Manuel Luis Quezon's Code of Ethics

Being a denizen of Kyusi, in honour of the man who gave my city its name and for being the most colourful prez the Philippines ever had, I have the pleasure to post Manuel L Quezon's Code of Ethics on his birthday. Let us profit from the wisdom of the Kastila.

1. Have Faith in the Divine Providence that guides the destinies of men and nations.

2. Love your country for it is the home of your people, the seat of your affection and the source of your happiness and well-being. It's defense is your primary duty. Be ready to sacrifice and die for it if necessary.

3. Respect the Constitution which is the expression of your sovereign will. The government is your government. It has been established for your safety and welfare. Obey the laws and see that they are observed by all and that public officials comply with their duties.

4. Pay your taxes willingly and promptly. Citizenship implies not only rights but obligations.

5. Safeguard the purity of suffrage and abide by the decisions of the…

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..."
Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government"
Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's El Filibusterismo. Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will instigate it.