Skip to main content

Missing the point about James Soriano's essay!

I do not know James Soriano but those netizens who know him say he is an Ateneo de Manila senior. The essay he wrote for the Manila Bulletin is honest on his experience in the use of English and Filipino in Filipino society. The mass of Filipino society especially on the net will label him as conyo, but we cannot fault him for that.

The class stratification in Philippine society is sharply demarcated by language use as this blogger writes. This cuts across regional and cultural boundaries. Since in almost all political jurisdictions, those who are elected to public office belong to the elite, we can observe that signs in public buildings are in English or may be bilingual but the sign in a Philippine language is less conspicuous than the one in English. I have seen and stared at these while peeing  in countless toilets in the Visayas and Mindanao, where a warning (pahibalo) in not flushing the toilet will result in a fine. The warning is in large font English and the one in a Visayan language is in a small font. And forget the national language by law established, Filipino. It does not figure at all in a Visayan toilet. English as stated by Dr Mike Tan (an Inquirer columnist, and dean of social science science and philosophy in UP Diliman) in a  recent lecture to my Science Technology and Society undergrad class, is a medium for enforcing the law, and since the enforcement of the law and justice in this country is defined by class lines, the language becomes a barrier to keep the lower classes away from the upper classes. This is exactly what the American colonizers hadn't intended.

And does not the policy of a school with a tarpaulin banner stating "English speaking school" reinforce that class barrier? It is not just the language but the school fees that reinforce the class barrier and this is extremely true for many schools in the Philippines which include the Ateneo and the nationalist University of the Philippines. While the latter universities do not have an English only policy, the medium for most discourse is in English. We cannot fault James Soriano for pointing that out. And for rights to language use, we have to doff out hats to the French high court justices who ruled in the late 1980s that it is against human rights to force a person to speak a language not of his choice.

The Americans, who had no experience in administering an empire,  but forced to have  imperialist policies after defeating the Spanish in the late 19th century, embarked on a program of democratizing access to education in their new colonies at the start of the 20th. And with it came the English language. Some products of this era are alive like the celebrated writer and Magsaysay laureate Frankie Sionil Jose now in his late 80s who in his essays has always insisted that the English language liberated him. In the "nationalist" 1970s some people have criticized him for not writing in Filipino.  In no way did the English language made him less of a Filipino or even as an Ilocano. His novels, essays and short stories prove that is not the case. But Sionil-Jose does not belong to the conyo class that Soriano does. Sionil-Jose comes from the peasant-working class. And in his social realist novels and much later essays, the language  is used as a call for Revolution (not in the Marxist sense but the sense of the Katipunan of 1896), similar to what Dr Rizal used Castillian for.

Criticism against Sionil-Jose is somewhat similar to small minded criticisms against balladeer Jose Mari Chan for his refusal to sing in Tagalog/Filipino but in English. Chan said that he can't express his being Filipino in a language he wasn't used to. Chan offered to write and sing songs in Ilonggo instead. But is Chan less of a Filipino than let us say labour leader and national artist Amado Hernandez (who wrote in Tagalog)? Little do people know that Chan composed a hit song in Tagalog but had another balladeer sing it.

The English language thus for Sionil Jose must become a medium of liberation and not a way to cling to privilege. Of course the use of English does confer privileges but perhaps that should make one realize and work for reducing the inequities in Philippine society. English can be a medium for that  too. The use of a certain language  does not make a Filipino less than a Filipino. It is what he/she does for the nation and the national identity that counts. One of my professors at UP learned Filipino/Tagalog in middle age but he gave the Filipino nation an international reputation in the sciences. Is he less Filipino than a Filipino who just spouts nationalist rhetoric?

The blogger linked in this post shoots the painful barb. The conyos who were offended were themselves conyos too. It is like the pot calling the kettle black. If the conyos truly read Soriano's essay they should have seen the problem with James Soriano. Mr Soriano appears to be unwilling to trade his privileges and connections as being part of the elite, for a Filipino identity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

President Manuel Luis Quezon's Code of Ethics

Being a denizen of Kyusi, in honour of the man who gave my city its name and for being the most colourful prez the Philippines ever had, I have the pleasure to post Manuel L Quezon's Code of Ethics on his birthday. Let us profit from the wisdom of the Kastila.

1. Have Faith in the Divine Providence that guides the destinies of men and nations.

2. Love your country for it is the home of your people, the seat of your affection and the source of your happiness and well-being. It's defense is your primary duty. Be ready to sacrifice and die for it if necessary.

3. Respect the Constitution which is the expression of your sovereign will. The government is your government. It has been established for your safety and welfare. Obey the laws and see that they are observed by all and that public officials comply with their duties.

4. Pay your taxes willingly and promptly. Citizenship implies not only rights but obligations.

5. Safeguard the purity of suffrage and abide by the decisions of the…

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..."
Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government"
Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's El Filibusterismo. Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will instigate it.

Kartilla of the Katipunan

In celebration of Andres Bonifacio Day on Nov 30, I am blogging my English translation of the Katipunan's Code of Ethics or Kartilla (Kartilya). Recruits to the revolutionary association had to learn these by heart. The code was first written by Emilio Jacinto. The Kartilya remains as relevant today as in 1896 .

My apologies for errors in translation. I know there are better translations than this one.

1) A life not spent for a holy and noble cause is like a tree without shade or a noxious weed.

2) Acts that stem from pride and selfishness do not come from a desire to help others..

3) True holiness comes from helping others, charity towards others and the measure of such is in each reasonable act or word.

4) Dark or white your skin may be, all men are equal though one may be greater in knowledge, material wealth, beauty these do not add to one’s humanity.

5) Those who are men of goodwill put honour before concern for self and those who do no good puts the self before honour.

6) For an ho…