Skip to main content

Theists 1... Atheists.. 0! common sense 1!

Rep Mong Palatino folded up as expected, withdrew his "religious neutrality bill" (I don't call it the "Ban God bill" since banning God is just like banning sex.. It just won't hold water). He apologised. I agree that he had nothing to apologise for especially for offending religious sensibilities (fanatics do that all the time..  ho humm). He should apologise to the public for his stupidity. This as expected given our own group of Freethinkers a dose of reality about Pinoy society.

The fact is Pinoy society is visual and it needs images. Politicians know this and so put "Epal" everywhere. Also Pinoy society is basically theist and so there isn't really space for the secular. But I have blogged about this.

Let me go to the idea of religious neutrality. The courts and our Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights hold freedom of worship as a fundamental human right. The Philippine Supreme Court has ruled that this right is supreme and even exempted some religious minorities from saluting state symbols like the Flag and the Anthem since they contend that this violates their religious conscience. However at least one religious group considers the Flag as a sacramental and it figures prominently in their liturgy.

Let's ban the Philippine Flag from government buildings. It is a religious symbol for at least one religious group!
Let us go to the Flag. The Flag is considered to be a religious symbol by other religious groups. If Palatino's bill came to pass then I would petition the courts to remove the Flag from all public areas since it violates the conscience of one religious minority which considers it a symbol that violates their belief not to worship any graven image and another larger religious group which considers it a sacramental and even has its saint-icons dressed in flag colours!

The same too with Rizal statues. One notable religious group worships Rizal and once on a visit to Fort Santiago's Rizal Shrine on December 30 (of course it was meant as a secular exercise in a secular memorial for me), I was surprised to see a Rizal Mass being celebrated before Rizal's wax statue (icon to the worshipers of course!).

And while we are at it, ban Rizal from all public state owned plazas and the Luneta. He is a religious symbol too!
The reader would have noticed the inherent silliness of Palatino's bill and the so called secularist intent in it. It is bound to open a can of worms.

If all religious symbols will have to be removed from public spaces then the State will have to define what a religious symbol is. This will violate the freedom of worship right in the Constitution. The State will have to officially recognize the doctrines and beliefs of religious groups for the purpose of defining what a religious symbol is. What will religious groups do? Send in a list of their religious symbols to Malacanang? This is a clear transgression of freedom of worship and is coercive. What if it refuses to recognize the Philippine Flag or Rizal as a religious symbol for certain minority religious groups? Then this effectively intrudes in their right to determine what kind of symbol they may venerate or worship.

The point is that by guaranteeing the civil right of freedom of worship, the State is obliged largely by convention and the people's good sense and wisdom to uphold religious neutrality. There is no need to put this under statute since the danger is by doing so the rights of religious groups especially those in the minority may be infringed. The US Supreme Court has ruled that a certain intermixture between religion and the State may be permitted but  excessive entanglement violates the non Establishment clause of the US Constitution. It may be that in the Philippines context, this intermixture may be broader than in the US but this is the nature of Filipino society and Philippine history is different from that of the USA. By nature the Filipino is religiously tolerant and ecumenical and drawing a narrower space for religion in public society may be harmful to public order than not. But then again Filipinos by and large respect the non establishment of religion that no one bothered to give a hoot (except the judge whose earlier ruling was reversed) when the Philippine Supreme Court confirmed a religious minority's right not to salute the Flag and Anthem.

This is the cold water on the Freethinkers. I posted Dr Rowan William's defence of why religion is needed in protecting pluralism and they attacked Dr William's being a religious personality and not the argument. This is the kind of Freethinking is dished on us. And BTW I have unintentionally skewered enough Freethinker arguments that I believe I can munch on Tani kebab... sorry Kani kebab!

Comments

docdix said…
This is very good... Tani-Kebab... that's a winner!

Popular posts from this blog

Kartilla of the Katipunan

In celebration of Andres Bonifacio Day on Nov 30, I am blogging my English translation of the Katipunan's Code of Ethics or Kartilla (Kartilya). Recruits to the revolutionary association had to learn these by heart. The code was first written by Emilio Jacinto. The Kartilya remains as relevant today as in 1896 .

My apologies for errors in translation. I know there are better translations than this one.

1) A life not spent for a holy and noble cause is like a tree without shade or a noxious weed.

2) Acts that stem from pride and selfishness do not come from a desire to help others..

3) True holiness comes from helping others, charity towards others and the measure of such is in each reasonable act or word.

4) Dark or white your skin may be, all men are equal though one may be greater in knowledge, material wealth, beauty these do not add to one’s humanity.

5) Those who are men of goodwill put honour before concern for self and those who do no good puts the self before honour.

6) For an ho…

President Manuel Luis Quezon's Code of Ethics

Being a denizen of Kyusi, in honour of the man who gave my city its name and for being the most colourful prez the Philippines ever had, I have the pleasure to post Manuel L Quezon's Code of Ethics on his birthday. Let us profit from the wisdom of the Kastila.

1. Have Faith in the Divine Providence that guides the destinies of men and nations.

2. Love your country for it is the home of your people, the seat of your affection and the source of your happiness and well-being. It's defense is your primary duty. Be ready to sacrifice and die for it if necessary.

3. Respect the Constitution which is the expression of your sovereign will. The government is your government. It has been established for your safety and welfare. Obey the laws and see that they are observed by all and that public officials comply with their duties.

4. Pay your taxes willingly and promptly. Citizenship implies not only rights but obligations.

5. Safeguard the purity of suffrage and abide by the decisions of the…

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..."
Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government"
Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's El Filibusterismo. Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will instigate it.