Skip to main content

Freedom in the world spawned by Alan Turing

The Geography of the Internet (from Wikipedia Commons)
This year the cyberworld marked the 100th birthday of Alan Turing, whose formalization of the algorithm for computable numbers made possible the machine that bears his name. This provided the basis for how computers work and eventually how the Internet operates.

This year too computer scientists marked the lamentable suicide of Turing after he was prosecuted as being gay, in a time when homosexuality was a criminal offence.

This post is not about gay rights but another right just as important, the right to free expression and speech in whatever the environment and locale. Freedom of expression is a universal human right as declared by the United Nations and is "beyond frontiers".

What then is this frontier? The UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights was made in 1948 just when Turing's machines were just being applied to military and civilian use . Now the world is vastly different, with information being exchanged instantaneously and that participants in this exchange are no longer passive receivers but active creators of content. Active creators require liberty and thus from the onset, the Net is democratic.

The Internet is a technological application that has evolved from patently military applications, developed by the universities (as the first computers were made for) which means there should be central control to a network that is now devoid of central control. Whatever the Net's origins, its architects built in to its structure, a culture of open sources and transparency that is at the bedrock of the online community. The Internet has its space albeit a virtual one and thus has its own geography.

While the Net has no central authority, this doesn't mean it has no power or more accurately "no means of gaining political power" The principle of Universal Standing, which is driven by social consensus in the Net provides a check and balance to abuses and even crimes. Everyone in cyberspace has the right to be heard but none has the right to be always taken seriously. There are some people who haven't made the complete transition from the past to the future and consider the Net as a mere medium. The fact is clear.  The Net is not a medium, it is a society and  like any society, it will come to a stage of development and maturity which requires the exercise of  sovereignty. And this is quite different from the sovereignty lawyers think the State should exercise.

And here lies the conflict for the State may impose laws which try to "tame" cyberspace by creating "Great Firewalls" and  onerous laws on defamation and libel. The sovereignty of the online community clashes with the sovereignty of government. And since in democracies at least, the sovereignty of the State comes much from the same people who are sovereign in cyberspace. Thus the clash is inevitable.

The ensuring debate and resistance to the Philippine Cybercrime Prevention Act is a clear example of this clash. Unlike in other jurisdictions, the reaction of the Filipino cybersovereign community is immediate and ranges from the legal and acceptable (petitioning the High Court) to what most cybercitizens consider by consensus illegal and unacceptable (hacking). The range of reaction is due to a legitimate grievance, severer penalties for libel and provisions in statute that are violative of civil rights. The most noticed here is the application of an 82 year old libel law on a 21st century phenomenon. And BTW the traditional media is no sacred cow in this phenomenon and by the nature of cyberspace will not be held in reverence.

Of course there are concerns about anonymity that can be abused and taken advantage of criminal elements but cybersociety is cognizant that technological developments again accepted by consensus and use can easily unmask anonymity and this should have the warrants given by the courts.  The cyberworld believes in the supremacy of the law in regulating its affairs.

The Philippines is experiencing another of its culture wars. Many of those in power believe that cyberspace is like what Africa was to the Colonial Imperialists of the 19th Century, a place of lesser intelligence, in the darkest limbo and in need of the civilizing effects of law and order and democracy! Thomas Jefferson and Jose Rizal would have loved the Net if they were still with us.

Those in power do not realize that democracy has made the paradigm shift and as our Science, Technology and Society undergrad students learn "The Future always Wins!"

 BENJAMIN VALLEJO JR PhD
is coordinator of the Science and Society Program of the University of the Philippines

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How should we remember General Antonio Luna?

Well it seems with that proposal to rename Camp Aguinaldo to Camp Antonio Luna in time for National Heroes Day has generated a lot of social media buzz. We really have to really understand our national heroes. Antonio Luna was a remarkable personality but like all of us was flawed. He likely would be an academic had the revolution not intervened. He would have been the first Dean of a College of Science of the Philippine University had the nation made the transition to indepe ndence in a peaceful manner. That was recognized by the American College of Pharmacy when they feted Dr Luna on what would have been his 60th birthday noting his work in combating malaria. But that was not to be. He became a soldier. General Luna was for a professional military within the bounds of the constitution. Perhaps that is the biggest sign of contradiction for today. Please answer the question: Would President Duterte (or a President Aquino, Marcos, Arroyo, Quezon etc) have a General Luna as his c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..." Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government" Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's  El Filibusterismo . Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Marikina River and the "janitor" fish

My newest environmental science research project is to determine the evolutionary biology of invasion by the "janitor fish" in Marikina River. Today we made our first survey and collections. Marikina River is the"greenest"in Metro Manila but that is just on the surface. One master's student is doing her thesis on biotic integrity and a volunteer MD is working on the project too. The "janitor fish (Pterygoplichthys sp) is the dominant fish now in the river,displacing traditional Marikina food fishes such as dalag and hito. The fish are collected and left to rot on the riverbanks. Despite this, there is still some subsistence fishing on the river. The highest densities of the fish are observed near sewage outfalls where they find food to eat. It is likely that the fish can be controlled if we can clean up the river! BTW the name "janitor fish" insults janitors. The fish thrive in dirty rivers and don't clean them up. Janitors on the other hand, ...
Post a Comment
Read more