Skip to main content

Science left behind in a society where science never took off! I

Dr Jose Rizal in the 13th chapter of his “El Filibusterismo” “The Class in Physics” describes the state of science education in late 19th Century Spanish Philippines. The Physics classroom cum laboratory at the University of Santo Tomas, then the Philippines’ only centre of advanced learning, was equipped with the latest teaching and research lab equipment but according to Rizal was hardly ever used for the intended purpose. In fact Rizal satirically writes that only the janitor and the doorman who out of curiosity, played with the instruments, ever benefited or learned science from the investment on those pieces of lab equipment.

A closer reading of Rizal beyond the satire shows the state of science in a society that places a greater importance on superstition and a perverse kind of Catholicism.

Rizal writes a damning indictment in the last paragraph of the chapter

He who weighs the value of a second and has ordained for His creatures as an elemental law progress and development, He, if He is just, will demand a strict accounting from those who must render it, of the millions of intelligences darkened and blinded, of human dignity trampled upon in millions of His creatures, and of the incalculable time lost and effort wasted! And if the teachings of the Gospel are based on truth, so also will these have to answer—the millions and millions who do not know how to preserve the light of their intelligences and their dignity of mind, as the master demanded an accounting from the cowardly servant for the talent that he let be taken from him.”

Science according to Rizal is necessary for society’s advancement simply because it is a search for truth. The truth shown by science is determined by experimentation and objective (scientific) realism. And that truth should liberate Filipino society from superstition, blind religion, ideology, discrimination and oppression. All of these are in the progressive agenda.

However a recent book  “Science Left Behind” (Public Affairs Books, 2012) by microbiologist Dr Alex B Berezow and Hank Campbell, editor of Science 2.0, examines the rise of anti-Science ideologies in the progressive movement. The authors argue that when the progressive movement abandoned empiricism for more relativistic ideologies, science was left aside and thus we have “scientific” controversies on animal rights, genetically modified (GM) food, rejection of vaccines stem cell research, reproductive health, alternative medicine among others.

But before we tackle this abandonment of empiricism and rationalism that according to the authors came in the wake of the publication of Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring” in 1962. Silent Spring is a milestone in the history of science, technology and society when progressives abandoned rationalism and empiricism became radical environmentalists working for the realization of a natural utopia, restored in its pristine form. This is a myth, a construct similar to that what Freethinkers claim for what Roman Catholic Church believes is the truth about human societies. But I shall come to that later.

The anti-science ideas held by postmodern progressives can be summarized in four points according to Berezow and Campbell

1.     Everything natural is good
2.     Everything unnatural is bad
3.     Unchecked science and progress will destroy us
4.     Science is only relative anyway

This idea of naturalness is rooted in postmodern relativism in which science is just one idea among others that none of them should have none of the preeminence it should have in discourse. This is a radical departure from the position held by Dr Rizal who maintained the objective validity of scientific reasoning (scientific realism) and that without it society will fail to advance.

This book is aimed at an American readership and specifically deals with science and politics in the United States. However it may be applicable to the debates on science, environment and population in the Philippines. Filipino progressives have largely borrowed progressive agendas from the West mainly from the United States and are now in the process of articulating this to varying degrees of success in the Filipino context. Perhaps the articulation of progressive ideas is most successful in the issue of climate change and resource use management that many Filipinos have now a concept of how to mitigate the impact of climate change or the negative effects of using plastic bags. Local governments nationwide have implemented no plastic bags ordinances. Do these policies translated to law have scientific basis?

It is a buzzword among the Filipino science community that public policy should be “science based”. While this sound like a sexy mantra and may get money from the government science agencies, the fact remains that public policy cannot be 100% based on science alone. When science is made into public policy, it is translated and with it the ideology or the political expediency of the moment gets mixed in. Science tests hypotheses with rigor and lets the data speak for itself. Politics on the other hand thrives on subjective truth. Thus there is a need to insulate science from ideology driven politicians, ministers of religion, Freethinkers, activists and advocates. Science should be free to speak for itself and science policy should be driven by data above anything else.

What has happened in late 20th century America and has seen its full flowering under the Obama presidency is that postmodern progressives have successively dominated the public discourse on science with their ideologically driven relativistic positions. This is also the case in the Philippines when progressives have hijacked the discourse on two major issues that have major consequences for national development, mining and population management.

I will focus on these two issues since they are national in scope and unlike animal rights or stem cell research or even genetically modified food which are issues for certain demographic sectors but not the whole nation.


Popular posts from this blog

Kartilla of the Katipunan

In celebration of Andres Bonifacio Day on Nov 30, I am blogging my English translation of the Katipunan's Code of Ethics or Kartilla (Kartilya). Recruits to the revolutionary association had to learn these by heart. The code was first written by Emilio Jacinto. The Kartilya remains as relevant today as in 1896 .

My apologies for errors in translation. I know there are better translations than this one.

1) A life not spent for a holy and noble cause is like a tree without shade or a noxious weed.

2) Acts that stem from pride and selfishness do not come from a desire to help others..

3) True holiness comes from helping others, charity towards others and the measure of such is in each reasonable act or word.

4) Dark or white your skin may be, all men are equal though one may be greater in knowledge, material wealth, beauty these do not add to one’s humanity.

5) Those who are men of goodwill put honour before concern for self and those who do no good puts the self before honour.

6) For an ho…

President Manuel Luis Quezon's Code of Ethics

Being a denizen of Kyusi, in honour of the man who gave my city its name and for being the most colourful prez the Philippines ever had, I have the pleasure to post Manuel L Quezon's Code of Ethics on his birthday. Let us profit from the wisdom of the Kastila.

1. Have Faith in the Divine Providence that guides the destinies of men and nations.

2. Love your country for it is the home of your people, the seat of your affection and the source of your happiness and well-being. It's defense is your primary duty. Be ready to sacrifice and die for it if necessary.

3. Respect the Constitution which is the expression of your sovereign will. The government is your government. It has been established for your safety and welfare. Obey the laws and see that they are observed by all and that public officials comply with their duties.

4. Pay your taxes willingly and promptly. Citizenship implies not only rights but obligations.

5. Safeguard the purity of suffrage and abide by the decisions of the…

Simoun's lamp has been lit, finally.. not by one but by the many!

"So often have we been haunted by the spectre of subversion which, with some fostering, has come to be a positive and real being, whose very name steals our serenity and makes us commit the greatest blunders... If before the reality, instead of changing the fear of one is increased, and the confusion of the other is exacerbated, then they must be left in the hands of time..."
Dr Jose Rizal "To the Filipino People and their Government"
Jose Rizal dominates the Luneta, which is sacred to the Philippine nation as a place of martyrdom. And many perhaps all of those executed in the Luneta, with the exception of the three Filipino secular priests martyred in 1872, have read Rizal's El Filibusterismo. Dr Rizal's second novel is a darker and more sinister one that its prequel but has much significance across the century and more after it was published for it preaches the need for revolution with caveats,  which are when the time is right and who will instigate it.